TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •
TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •
TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •
TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •
TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •
TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •
TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •
TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •
TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •
TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •
TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •
TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •
TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •
TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •
TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •
TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •
TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •
TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •
TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •
TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •TRADEMARK • COPYRIGHT • LITIGATION • CONSULTATION • IP PROTECTION •

SCHEDULE OF SERVICES

Effective Date: January 14, 2026

Below is the comprehensive fee schedule for Etumon LLP. All services are executed with strict legal compliance and strategic foresight.

01: CONSULTATION

Strategic advice and feasibility checks.

ParticularsCoverageFee (INR)
General Advice (No Research)1st Advice Free to New InquiryFREE
General Advice (No Research)Unproductive sessions to be billedFREE/PAID
Trademark RegistrabilityResearch-based advice per Trademark1,000.00
Deep Study ReportAfter comprehensive research5,000.00
Advice on Cease & DesistResearch-based advice on Notice3,000.00
Advice on OppositionResearch-based advice on Rectification/Opposition3,000.00
Advice on InfringementResearch-based advice on Law Suit5,000.00

02: CORPORATE PACKAGE [01C]

Focus: Strong planning and end-to-end service.

ParticularsCoverageFee (INR)
Single ApplicationStrong planning to win, Application, Formality Check, Substantive Examination, Show Cause Hearing. Brand Naming Service Provided.22,556.00
Three or More AppsSingle Bill19,904.00
Claim User FoundationExhibit data collection, Draft Affidavit, Procuring Notarized Affidavit, Application only.FREE
Claim AssociationEstablishing association with earlier mark.FREE
Strategy & TrackingProvided till pendency of application.FREE

03: STARTER PACKAGE [03S]

Focus: Application filing essentials.

ParticularsCoverageFee (INR)
Single ApplicationApplication Only. (Name suggestion not provided).7,556.00
Three or More AppsSingle Bill.6,556.00
Claim User FoundationExhibit data collection, Draft Affidavit, Procuring Notarized Affidavit, Application only.3,000.00
Claim AssociationEstablishing association with earlier mark.1,000.00
Strategy & TrackingNot Provided.N/A

04: POST APPLICATION COMPLIANCE

Handling objections and formalities.

ParticularsCoverageFee (INR)
Formality Check FailFile MIS-F2,500.00
Formality Check FailFile TM-M3,500.00
Reply to ObjectionFile MIS-R (Non-Complicated)4,000.00
Reply to ObjectionFile MIS-R (Complicated)6,000.00
Trademark CorrectionFiling TM-M for correction / deletion3,500.00
Show Cause HearingPreparing exhibits of use, Draft Affidavit, Timely upload & Personal Appearance until disposal.11,000.00
Withdraw ApplicationPreparing & Filing Withdrawal Application2,500.00
Change AddressFile TM-M CAS3,500.00

05: OPPOSITION PROCEEDING

Defending or Opposing Trademarks.

ParticularsCoverageFee (INR)
Service of Opposition NoticeRule-437,735.00
CounterstatementRule-448,735.00
Evidence Affidavit (Supp. Opposition)Rule-4510,000.00
Correspondence in Lieu of EvidenceRule-456,000.00
Evidence Affidavit (Supp. Application)Rule-4610,000.00
Correspondence in Lieu of EvidenceRule-466,000.00
Further Evidence AffidavitRule-477,500.00
Correspondence in Lieu of Further EvidenceRule-476,000.00
Opposition HearingPhysical Hearing at Headquarters25,000.00
Withdraw OppositionWithdraw Opposed Application / Notice3,000.00

06: POST-REGISTRATION ACTIVITIES

Maintenance and Renewal.

ParticularsCoverageFee (INR)
Trademark RenewalEarly Renewal (End of 9th Year)12,108.00
Last Moment RenewalBeginning of 10th Year14,108.00
Renew Expired TMWithin 6 months of expiry19,165.00
Restore Expired TMRestoration process24,215.00
Cancel TrademarkVoluntary Cancellation3,912.00

07: RECTIFICATION PROCEEDING

Correcting the Register.

ParticularsCoverageFee (INR)
Service of Rectification NoticeRule-437,735.00
CounterstatementRule-448,735.00
Evidence AffidavitRule-4510,000.00
Correspondence in Lieu of EvidenceRule-456,000.00
Evidence Affidavit (Supp. Application)Rule-4610,000.00
Correspondence in Lieu of EvidenceRule-466,000.00
Further Evidence AffidavitRule-477,500.00
Correspondence in Lieu of Further EvidenceRule-476,000.00
Rectification HearingPhysical Hearing at Headquarters25,000.00
Withdraw RectificationWithdraw Notice3,000.00

08, 09, 10: ASSIGNMENT, WATCH & LEGAL

Miscellaneous Services.

08 Assignment

  • Assignment of Trademark16,608.00
  • Licensing of Trademark21,608.00

09 Trademark Watch

  • Continuous Conflict Tracking (Yearly)10,000.00
  • eDiscovery (Per Case)2,000.00

10 Legal Services

  • Cease & Desist Notice10,000.00
  • Law Suit InfringementContact for Quote

11, 12, 13: COPYRIGHT SERVICES

Literary & Artistic Protection.

Literary [11] & Artistic [13]

ActivityFee (INR)
Application3,500.00
Reply to Discrepancy Letter3,000.00
Reply to Correspondence3,000.00
Reply to Objection5,000.00
Hearing5,000.00

Copyright Search Report [12]

ActivityFee (INR)
Search Application (Form TM-C)12,108.00
Reply to Objection5,000.00
Show Cause Hearing5,000.00